Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Abood_v._Detroit_Board_of_Education an entity of type: Thing
Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977), was a US labor law case where the United States Supreme Court upheld the maintaining of a union shop in a public workplace. Public school teachers in Detroit had sought to overturn the requirement that they pay fees equivalent to union dues on the grounds that they opposed public sector collective bargaining and objected to the political activities of the union. In a unanimous decision, the Court affirmed that the union shop, legal in the private sector, is also legal in the public sector. They found that non-members may be assessed agency fees to recover the costs of "collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment purposes" while insisting that objectors to union membership or policy may not have their due
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
D. Louis Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
xsd:integer
34710340
xsd:integer
1066215278
rdf:langString
Rehearing denied, .
xsd:integer
75
rdf:langString
Brennan, White, Marshall, Rehnquist, Stevens
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
209
xsd:integer
431
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-09
xsd:integer
1976
rdf:langString
Abood v. Detroit Board of Education,
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-23
xsd:integer
1977
rdf:langString
D. Louis Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
rdf:langString
"Agency shop" clause whereby every employee represented by a union, even though not a union member, must pay to the union, as a condition of employment, a service charge equal in amount to union dues, was valid insofar as the service charges are used to finance expenditures by the union for collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment purposes.
rdf:langString
Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
rdf:langString
Stewart
rdf:langString
Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977), was a US labor law case where the United States Supreme Court upheld the maintaining of a union shop in a public workplace. Public school teachers in Detroit had sought to overturn the requirement that they pay fees equivalent to union dues on the grounds that they opposed public sector collective bargaining and objected to the political activities of the union. In a unanimous decision, the Court affirmed that the union shop, legal in the private sector, is also legal in the public sector. They found that non-members may be assessed agency fees to recover the costs of "collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment purposes" while insisting that objectors to union membership or policy may not have their dues used for other ideological or political purposes. Abood was overturned in the 2018 case Janus v. AFSCME, which found that Abood had failed to properly assess the First Amendment principles in its decision.
rdf:langString
Powell
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Burger, Blackmun
rdf:langString
Janus v. AFSCME
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
8259