1722 British general election

rdf:langString 1722 British general election

rdf:langString #ddd

rdf:langString Whigs

rdf:langString Whigs

rdf:langString Kingdom of Great Britain

rdf:langString Robert-Walpole-1st-Earl-of-Orford.jpg

rdf:langString Sir William Wyndham, 3rd Bt by Jonathan Richardson.jpg

rdf:langString no

rdf:langString Whigs

rdf:langString Tories

rdf:langString Prime Minister after

rdf:langString election

rdf:langString All 558 seats in the House of Commons

rdf:langString Parliamentary seats

rdf:langString parliamentary

rdf:langString The 1722 British general election elected members to serve in the House of Commons of the 6th Parliament of Great Britain. This was the fifth such election since the merger of the Parliament of England and the Parliament of Scotland in 1707. Thanks to the Septennial Act of 1715, which swept away the maximum three-year life of a parliament created by the Meeting of Parliament Act 1694, it followed some seven years after the previous election, that of 1715. The election was fiercely fought, with contests taking place in more than half of the constituencies, which was unusual for the time. Despite the level of public involvement, however, with the Whigs having consolidated their control over virtually every branch of government, Walpole's party commanded almost a monopoly of electoral patronage, and was therefore able to increase its majority in Parliament even as its popular support fell. In the midst of the election, word came from France of a Jacobite plot aimed at an imminent coup d'état. Led by Francis Atterbury, Bishop of Rochester, Lord North and Grey, and other Tory opponents of Walpole, this was later known as the "Atterbury Plot". Previously election results had broadly reflected the opinion of at least the minority of adult males who had the vote, although the system had always been subject to the influence of corruption and patronage. However, now that one-party government had been established, those influences could be used systematically to ensure the governing party's victory. This election set the pattern for much of the rest of the eighteenth century; as partisan feeling began to decline during the years of the Whig oligarchy, the rigging of elections became ever easier, so that British governments could almost always guarantee victory.